David Blower’s brief (60 pages) study of the Book of Jonah challenges the main foundation of most popular interpretations of this book, i.e., Jonah was a bigot whose exaggerated hatred for the people of Nineveh led him to “run away” from God’s call to preach to the people of Nineveh. Not only did Jonah seek to evade God’s call, he did so via the ridiculous action of getting on a ship going as far away in the opposite direction from Nineveh as possible. Speaking personally, I have promoted this popular interpretation of Jonah over the years in preaching sermons, leading Bible studies, and conducting retreats.
However, Blower sees a serious flaw in this interpretation. He feels it can lead (particularly in the hands of an interpreter who is hostile to Jews and Judaism) to the false notion that Jonah’s bigotry is somehow characteristically Jewish. This can then lead to an artificial (and frequently antisemitic) contrast between “Jewish exclusivism” and “Christian universalism”.
Blower works from a radically different starting-point than the popular view of “Jonah-as-Bigot”. His starting point is that Jonah’s loathing for Nineveh was well-grounded in reality. The Assyrian Empire, of which Nineveh was the capital, was a particularly cruel empire in terms of its treatment of its enemies and its conquered peoples. Blower compared Jonah’s eventual preaching in Nineveh to that of a person standing up in the midst of an ISIS stronghold or a Nazi rally to proclaim an alternate viewpoint to that of the prevailing ideology. Jonah’s initial wish to avoid going to Nineveh need not have been a sign of bigotry. It was merely a sign of an intelligent desire for self-preservation.
Jonah’s eventual decision to proclaim God’s message in
Nineveh, leading to the surprising repentance of the Ninevites, stands at the
heart of the Book of Jonah. God is able
to radically transform even the most destructive realities found in our
world. This, according to Blower, is the
subversive message of the Book of Jonah.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Constructive comments, from a diversity of viewpoints, are always welcome. I reserve the right to choose which comments will be printed. I'm happy to post opinions differing from mine. Courtesy, an ecumenical attitude, and a willingness to give your name always help. A sense of humour is a definite "plus", as well.