Barth looked at the words on the side of the barn,
thought for a while, and said: “Ja, but Jesus is also the question.”
In today’s
lesson, Jesus is also the question.
Our lesson
begins with the Sadducees asking Jesus a stupid question.
Sometimes, if
you’re at a public meeting and the speaker consents to have a period of
questions and answers, you’re often apt to hear at least one stupid
question.
Now, by “stupid
question”, I don’t mean the sort of question that is asked by the person who
doesn’t understand the issue and is honestly seeking information or
clarification. That’s not a stupid
question.
I’m thinking of
the sort of question that is aggressive in its stupidity, the question that’s
asked by the person who wants to demonstrate his own knowledge of the topic, at
the expense of the speaker. That’s the
sort of aggressively stupid question the Sadducees asked Jesus.
But, first, we
may want some background to the Sadducees and who they were. The Sadducees were the extreme conservatives
of Jesus’ day. They held to the Law
literally. For them, there was no room
for interpretation where the law was concerned.
The Sadducees were opposed to the Pharisees who were of a more
progressive bent, despite their bad press and the way we use the word
“Pharisee” today. (When we use the word “Pharisee” in English to mean a
small-minded religious bigot, as many people do, this use of the word is highly
unjust to the Pharisees.)
One important
thing about the Sadducees was that they did not believe in the resurrection of
the dead. In the Old Testament, any
belief in a life after this physical life was very slow in developing. In fact, it was only during the century or two just before the time of Jesus that much of a belief in a life after this one was
found among the Jews.
The Sadducees
opposed this development. The reason the
Sadducees opposed this new emerging belief in the life of the world to come was
that they couldn’t fit the idea into a literal view of the law. The question they asked Jesus in our lesson
was the standard Sadducee-type question:
“If a woman married seven men, whose wife would she be after the
resurrection?”
This question
has a background. The Jewish law said
that if a man died without leaving an heir, his brother (or his nearest
unmarried male relative) was obliged to marry his widow and produce an
heir. This was the theme of the book of
Ruth.
Anyway, for
Sadducees with a literal view of the law and with a tendency to downplay the
resurrection of the dead, this was the standard trick question to discredit
those who seemed to accept an idea of the life of the world to come.
Jesus responded
to the question. Not only did he give a
good answer, but he tried to assist the Sadducees to find a better
question. This was just as important, if
not more so. As Karl Barth said: “Jesus is also the question.”
The Sadducees
asked Jesus the wrong question on a number of grounds:
1. The question assumed that the woman
involved had no dignity of her own, that the woman’s status in God’s future
life depended on whose wife she was. It
was a bad question just on this basis alone.
2. The question assumed, as well, that the
men involved had a reduced dignity in God’s future life if they were without a
wife or without heirs. It was a bad question
just on this basis alone.
3. And worst of all, the question assumed
that God’s truth is set in the past, that people cannot discover new aspects of
God’s emerging truth for a new era. The
emerging new truth of the life of God’s future was seen as somehow without
merit if it was seen as contradicting those treasured truths of the past. It was a bad question just on this basis
alone.
And we still
find this today. There are many people
of faith who, even with the best will in the world, cannot for the life of them
see new aspects of God’s truth emerging for a new time and a new place. As we frequently sing in the classic hymn,
“The Lord has yet more light and truth to break forth from the word.”
Sadly,
many Christians cannot grasp this.
·
To give one example, many Christians
cannot see the presence of God in the lives of people of other faiths (Jews,
Muslims, Baha’is, Buddhists, and others.).
“The Lord has yet more light and truth to break forth from the
word.”
·
To give another example, many Christians
cannot see faithful, life-giving, God-blessed relationships among couples that
have not entered into a formal marriage, whether these couples are heterosexual
or same-gender. “The Lord has yet more
light and truth to break forth from the word.”
God’s truth
comes freshly to God’s people in every generation. “The Lord has yet more light and truth to
break forth from the word.”
Today, as it was
two thousand years ago, Jesus is also the question.
May God grant
each of us the sensitivity to receive with enthusiasm God’s new truth in our
new day.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Constructive comments, from a diversity of viewpoints, are always welcome. I reserve the right to choose which comments will be printed. I'm happy to post opinions differing from mine. Courtesy, an ecumenical attitude, and a willingness to give your name always help. A sense of humour is a definite "plus", as well.