I recognise that, in many ways, I'm a child of the Reformation.
- I celebrate the fact that the denomination of which I'm a member and a minister (the Uniting Church in Australia) ordains and commissions both women and men to every ministry within the church, without exception.
- I celebrate the fact that the denomination of which I'm a member and a minister has committed each of its congregations to provide a safe and welcoming community for LGBT people.
- I recognise that congregational singing is an important part of worship for me, and I further recognise that the hymns which cause the hairs on the back of my neck to particularly stand at attention are such Reformation-era German hymns as "Now thank we all our God..." and "Praise to the Lord, the Almighty...".
- Above all, I celebrate that a commitment to an "open table" is a reality that is deep within the DNA of the vast majority of congregations within my denomination.
Nevertheless, I choose not to celebrate the 500th anniversary of the Reformation on this coming 31st of October, for a number of reasons.
1. I take issue with the notion, strong in some "Protestant" circles,
that "getting your theology right" is an essential precondition to a healthy relationship with God. Now, I know that this was never taught by Luther, even if Calvin came close to it. When Luther wrote about "faith", he meant a bedrock trust in God's radical grace. Over the centuries, though, many "Protestants" have promoted the idea that those who "get their theology wrong" are somehow destined to become fuel for an eternal BBQ. I refuse to celebrate this destructive idea.
2. I also take issue with the way that Luther's idea of sola scriptura ("Scripture alone") has been used to turn the Bible into almost an idol in some "Protestant" churches. I believe that the person of faith should take the scriptures "seriously, but not literally" (as an advertisement for one congregation once said). The scriptures are a sourcebook for faith, with which the person of faith should engage in on-going dialogue, with the dialogue occasionally becoming robust debate, if not a knock-down, drag-out brawl (metaphorically speaking, of course). Turning the scriptures into an infallible oracle, or a idol, is simply an abuse of scripture. I refuse to celebrate this destructive idea as well.
3. I also take issue with the way that worship has merely become a teaching event in so many "Protestant" churches. Now, I'm not talking about the "megachurch" experience in many "evangelical" churches where a congregation's Sunday gatherings are part second-rate pop music gig, part motivational speaker, and part political rally. That particular liturgical atrocity is far outside the experience of most of the churches I know.
My concern is with the congregations within the "Protestant" mainstream where the teaching-learning dimension of worship dominates every other aspect of worship. This happens regardless of a congregation's denomination or theological emphasis. This happens regardless of whether the congregation's worship style is a 1950s "preaching service", a 1970s "all-age family service", a 1990s "Fresh Expression", or the standard-issue Uniting Church "blended-blanded" service (where the highlight of Sunday morning is usually the refreshments - and frequently the accompanying gossip - following the worship service). In all these styles of worship, the teaching element of worship predominates.
I believe that people who choose to attend worship in our day do so with the intention of experiencing communion with the God worshipped by the congregation, not merely to "learn things about religion". I do not choose to celebrate a state of affairs in which worship has been so marginalised.
4. Finally and in my mind most importantly, the divided state of the Christian Church today is a continuing scandal. A particular scandal is the inability of any Christian to fully participate in the Eucharist / Lord's Supper / Holy Communion / Mass in many other gatherings of Christians for worship. I refuse to celebrate a divided Christian church. Therefore, I refuse to celebrate the 31st of October.